Archive for April, 2010

Dark Liquors Cause Worse Hangovers, But All Impair Morning-After Performance

Drinking darker-colored liquor like whiskey or bourbon is more likely to leave you with a hangover the next day than downing vodka or other clear liquors, researchers say.

However, no matter what you drink your cognitive function is likely to be impaired even after you sober up, LiveScience reported Dec. 18.

Dark-colored liquors contain more congeners — toxic substances caused by fermentation — than light-colored ones. "While the alcohol alone is enough to make many people feel sick the next day, these toxic natural substances can add to the ill effects as our body reacts to them," said study author Damaris Rohsenow of the Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies at Brown University.

Researchers found that drinking alcohol made study subjects feel worse the next day than those who received a placebo, and that those who were given bourbon to drink felt more hung over than those who drank vodka. Bourbon and vodka drinkers performed equally poorly on cognitive tests, the study showed.

The research was published online in the journal Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research.

Study on alcohol reveals drinkers not only zone out — but also are unaware that they do.

A new study out of the University of Pittsburgh suggests that a moderate dose of alcohol increases a person’s mind wandering, while at the same time reducing the likelihood of noticing that one’s mind has wandered.

The paper, titled “Lost in the Sauce: The Effects of Alcohol on Mind Wandering,” explores this phenomenon and is published in this month’s issue of Psychological Science.

The study provides the first evidence that alcohol disrupts an individual’s ability to realize his or her mind has wandered, suggesting impairment of the knowledge and experiences we have about our own thinking processes, a psychological state called meta-consciousness. These findings suggest that distinct processes are responsible for causing a thought to occur, as opposed to allowing its presence to be noticed.

The researchers studied a group of men—half of whom had consumed alcohol and half of whom had been given a placebo. After 30 minutes, the participants began reading a portion of Tolstoy’s War and Peace from a computer screen. If they caught themselves zoning out—having no idea what they had just read or thinking about something other than the text—they pressed a key on the keyboard. They also were prompted at intervals, to see if they could be “caught” mind-wandering before they realized it themselves.

The results revealed that while they were reading the text those who had consumed alcohol were mind-wandering without realizing it about 25 percent of the time—more than double that of those who had not consumed alcohol. But as far as “catching themselves” zoning out, those who had been drinking were no more likely to do so than the other group. Participants in the alcohol group would have had many more opportunities to catch themselves because they zoned out more often—but they did not. They were impaired in their ability to notice their own mind-wandering episodes.

“Researchers have known for a while that alcohol consumption can interfere with our limited-capacity powers of concentration,” said Sayette. “But this “double-whammy,”(i.e., more zoneouts that take longer to recognize) may explain why alcohol often disrupts efforts to exercise self-control—a process requiring the ability to become aware of one’s current state in order to regulate it.”

These findings have potentially important implications for understanding the disruptive effects of alcohol. For example, the observation that alcohol increases mind-wandering suggests another reason why alcohol makes driving dangerous—drunk drivers may lose track of what they are doing.

Moreover, the finding that alcohol reduces meta-consciousness may explain why people drive when they are drunk—by reducing their ability to assess their current state, intoxicated people may fail to realize how intoxicated they are and thus inadequately appraise the danger of driving.

Woman drinking glass of white wine uid 1280894 What are the harms associated with drinking to intoxication?

Drinking to intoxication can put you into situations that might be dangerous, embarrassing, or which you may later regret. Every time you drink, you are at risk of causing harm to yourself or others. Risky and/or high risk drinking can result in both short and long-term harms, including:

Short-term harms

The risks associated with short-term harm can include immediate health and social problems, such as:

  • injuries from violence (as a perpetrator, a victim, or a witness);
  • pedestrian and road accidents (death/severe injury);
  • drowning;
  • trauma related admissions to hospital emergency departments;
  • alcohol poisoning;
  • social and personal consequences such as the impact on families and social embarrassment;
  • loss of valuable items ie phone or wallet; and
  • having unprotected sex and placing yourself at greater risk of a sexually transmitted infection (STI) and/or an unwanted pregnancy.

Long-term harms

Risky and high risk drinking during early adulthood may also have serious longer-term consequences, including:

  • social problems, such as spending more time drinking than pursuing other interests;
  • brain damage, including the inability to learn and remember things;
  • depression and suicidal thoughts;
  • the development of chronic disease, including some cancers and heart disease;
  • cirrhosis of the liver; and
  • dependence on alcohol.

Levels of risk

The 2009 Australian Alcohol Guidelines (AAGs) provide a framework for categorising low risk, risky and high risk drinking for both short and long-term harm.

The level of risk associated with drinking both in the short term and the long term depends on a variety of factors. But generally:

  • Low risk levels define a level of drinking at which there is a minimal risk of harm.
  • Risky levels are those at which the risk of harm is significantly increased beyond any possible benefits.
  • High risk drinking levels are those at which there is substantial risk of serious harm, and above which risk continues to increase rapidly.

Guidelines at a glance

For healthy men & women:

  • Drinking no more than 2 standard drinks on any day reduces the lifetime risk of harm from alcohol-related disease or injury.
  • Drinking no more than 4 standard drinks on a single occasion reduces the risk of alcohol-related injury (arising from that occasion).

More at; The Drinking Nightmare

Heavy Drinkers Engage in Array of Unhealthy Behaviors

New research suggests that heavy drinking is just one part of a constellation of unhealthy and unwise behaviors, HealthDay News.

Researchers who surveyed 7,884 hospital patients in Oregon and Washington found that risky drinkers — those who had an average of three or more alcoholic drinks daily

  • were more likely to have poor eating habits and
  • not wear seatbelts, and
  • were less likely to see their doctors regularly.
  • They also were less likely to think that they could change their own health behaviors.

"People should not only be concerned about heavy drinking, but also these other health-related practices," said study author Carla Green of the Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research.

Moderate drinkers were more likely to report good health than either heavy drinkers or abstainers or light drinkers, the study also found.

The findings were published in the journal Addiction Research and Theory.

Peer Influence, Other Social Factors Can Affect Drinking Among Older Adults

As with underage drinking, social factors can help predict excessive drinking among older adults, according to new research from Rudolf H. Moos of the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System in Palo Alto, Calif.

Moos and colleagues studied 719 men and women ages 55 to 65 over a 20-year period and found that those with more money, a more active social life, and friends who approved of drinking were more likely to engage in risky or excessive drinking.

"Older adults who engage in high-risk alcohol consumption tend to select friends who are more likely to drink and to approve of drinking," said Moos.

Charles J. Holahan, a professor in the department of psychology at the University of Texas at Austin said the findings "demonstrate that a spouse and friends can make a constructive difference in later life drinking. However, a spouse and friends can also unwittingly become caught up as facilitators in the process of later life drinking."

The study is available online in the journal Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research.

  

Bad Behavior has blocked 217 access attempts in the last 7 days.